Posts tagged ‘communication’

December 2, 2010

How Facebook Messages Will Influence SharePoint…

The other week Facebook announced a new capability called Facebook Messages — their new email/SMS/chat functionality that doesn’t care what technology you use to reach your friends.  Mark Zuckerberg called it “next generation messaging” and described it as seamless, informal, immediate, personal, simple, minimal, and short.   In an interview with Joel Seligstein, the Engineering Manager in charge of Facebook’s new Messages product, he was quoted as saying:

“One main thing that we noticed was that lots of communication was happening both in Facebook and outside Facebook. I’d send emails to people all the time — that means I have to check my email address many times a day. I’d really rather have that personal, people-to-people communication along with my other Facebook messages. Same thing over SMS — as I moved to an iPhone, for example, I was kind of obsessed with how those messages came in through that channel. So really what we’re trying to do is figure how to bring all personal communication together.”

While Facebook focuses on our personal lives, the important take-away from their recent announcement is how Facebook is providing the capability for its 500 million global users to consolidate both synchronous and asynchronous communications into one unified platform and interface.   Similar to how communications are happening outside of Facebook, business conversations mostly occur OUTSIDE of SharePoint.   As knowledge workers, we continue to use email and mobile devices which has made it more and more challenging to track:

  1. what was said and who said what
  2. who is talking to who and who should be talking to who
  3. what decision was made and approvals
  4. what the resolution on a specific issue was
  5. status of projects, issues, ideas, etc…
  6. threaded discussions and responses
  7. what tasks are assigned and when they’re due

Of course it’s not just about digital communications in email.  There’s IMs, voicemails, web conferences, phone conferences, etc…   Enter Microsoft Lync 2010 just announced today which aims at enhancing that unified communication experience.   From what I’ve seen, Lync looks promising.   Perhaps Microsoft is working closely with their Facebook investment behind the scenes as the timing of Facebook’s and Microsoft’s announcements seem coordinated.  However, I’m wondering exactly how Lync will actually provide an easier way to capture and manage all of the threads of synchronous messaging information into an organized “context”?   And more importantly what integration will Lync have directly into SharePoint?

In an ideal world, SharePoint should provide similar capabilities as Facebook — integrating synchronous messaging more seamlessly into the platform and providing a more organized “context” to manage this information.   For example, the business context might be a project team site — a concept we all understand.   Ideally, all related project communications and activity streams might be captured inside a team site or perhaps in some organized fashion within my sites.   As a project manager or executive, I might want to view the status of all project issues in a SharePoint list and see the all the related synchronous messages associated with each issue.   Why can’t SharePoint capture or tag all related messaging threads related to a project?   Why is that I can’t see all the activity streams AND emails AND instant messages AND web/conference recordings related to a project all in one place?    Why is that compliance and e-Discovery aren’t easier by consolidating all communication streams within 1 organized business context?

Just as Facebook has said their new messaging capability is not meant to replace email, I don’t see our corporate mailboxes disappearing anytime soon.  I’m hopeful that Exchange, Lync and SharePoint together will enable us to better manage both asynchronous and synchronous information together in a single unified interface just as Facebook is doing with the release of their next generation messaging.   The capabilities of Microsoft’s platforms all represent a promising eco-system for business communication, collaboration, and information management.  And I’m optimistic that Facebook will influence SharePoint for the better and allow for more effective business communication and collaboration “in context”.

References:

Interview with Joel Seligstein, the Engineering Manager in charge of Facebook’s new Messages product:  http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/15/inside-the-war-room-answering-the-questions-behind-facebook-messages

Facebook Messages Walkthrough Pics: http://mashable.com/2010/11/15/facebook-messages-walkthrough-pics/

Facebook Messages on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdzuFG6q63k

4 Reasons Why Microsoft Will Shift the Business Productivity Paradigmhttp://sp.meetdux.com/archive/2010/11/16/Microsoft-Unified-Communications-Collab-SharePoint-Lync-Exchange.aspx

Microsoft Lync Overview: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/lync/technology-overview.aspx

 

May 19, 2010

Top Traits of a Good PM – PMI Metrolina May Meeting

I attended the local PMI chapter meeting last night.   NouvEON had a strong presence which was great to see since they sponsored the meeting last night.  I also took some notes on the speaker — of course I didn’t write his name down.   He began by outlining the characteristics that make up a good Project Manager to “Win at the PM Game” – the subject of his presentation:
1. being assertive & an extrovert
2. communication skills
3. ability to manage sponsors
4. adding value
5. presentation matters
6. ROI
There’s probably more but those are what I captured and I’d be interested in hearing other people’s ideas on what makes up a good PM.  The bulk his presentation focused on communication as 90% of what a PM does….which flowed into building trust, relationships, listening to voice of customer, knowing the audience, negotiation, defining goals/objectives, etc…   Dr Phil he was not, but he raised some good points about communcation.
One of the most important things relating to communcation was building a relationship and trust — which can be achieved through openness and our ability to communicate across time & space.   While he mentioned email, oral, and written communication — no where did he mention collaboration tools like SharePoint — which in my opinion can help achieve trust and openness and provide visibility of information.   A woman from the audience even asked about how we can build relationships & trust in virtual teams — which we ALL work in today.   The speaker really didn’t have a good response.   I almost jumped in to respond and wanted to argue that email actually is a bad way to have discussions and build relationships.  Many times, people write TOO much in an email and immediately we dismiss them or ignore their communication — which doesn’t help the overall relationship.   With email you lose context, miss discussions & important information, etc, etc….   The “message” and the meaning and actionable items often get lost in email.    Of course if we use a technology like SharePoint correctly, it can be a very powerful tool for communication, building trust, providing transparency & visibility for any team — virtually or locally in the same building (let’s face it, we often times email people down the hall or on another floor!)
Anyway, the last takewaways from the speaker were the following:
The speaker’s formula to breakdown communication and relationships:
-Simplicity + Lack of Communication – Trust – R – Credibility x Adaptability
(Unfortunately I can’t remember what the R was for).
And one participant in the audience mentioned Steven Covey’s new book “The Speed of Trust” which talks about all of this.  Perhaps the speaker read Mr Coveys book and based his presentation on it without citing him! :)     When that was mentioned I thought of another book I read when I first started as a consultant: “Managing the Professional Services Firm“.  There were 3 things that I remember to this day that help me as a consultant & PM:
1. Confidence
2. Competence
3. Credibility
I guess we could add a 4th C and include “Communication”….


Share/Bookmark

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.